1) molar agenesis were assigned to a control group. |
2) d into eight groups with six rats in each group. |
3) , clonazepam abuse, and combination abuse group. |
4) mmetry after PEERS, versus a waitlist ASD group. |
5) istilled water except the distilled water group. |
6) aining of WRF versus compulsory education group. |
7) ine was similarly injected in the control group. |
8) tly from baseline to months 3 or 6 in any group. |
9) ivity may also be protective for the Oslo group. |
10) g structures in order to reach the target group. |
11) BTs that most efficiently applied to each group. |
12) ely small compared with those of the BoTA group. |
13) ns increased significantly in DES-treated group. |
14) , in turn, the poor prognosis in this age group. |
15) culated with MF compared with the control group. |
16) remission occurred in two dogs from each group. |
17) similar to that of pregabalin-pretreated group. |
18) red reperfusion strategy for this patient group. |
19) pared with no degeneration in the control group. |
20) in the 200 mg/kg/day (p < 0.003) group. |
21) period (0.24 ± 0.23 mm) in the LPT group. |
22) ssigned to either intervention or control group. |
23) creased slightly less in the intervention group. |
24) creased in degenerating neurons of the Cd group. |
25) groups was similar to that of the control group. |
26) al time of 5 min in the laser-irradiated group. |
27) of ERα was decreased in the male treated group. |
28) d as markers of exposure for the examined group. |
29) t teeth in a Japanese orthodontic patient group. |
30) rsenide laser over 15 days, and a control group. |
31) ificantly lower than that of air abrasion group. |
32) mized interventional study with a control group. |
33) the two groups had higher values than AA group. |
|