ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -

return kwic search for who out of >500 occurrences
271863 occurrences (No.95 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
372) Individual differences in SDO significantly predicted support for the use of cognitive ability tests in all samples, after controlling for SAT/ACT scores and test self-efficacy and also among participants who read facts about cognitive ability tests.
--- ABSTRACT ---
PMID:24219574 DOI:10.1111/jopy.12078
2015 Journal of personality
* Individual differences in social dominance orientation predict support for the use of cognitive ability tests.
- This study investigates the personality processes involved in the debate surrounding the use of cognitive ability tests in college admissions. In Study 1, 108 undergraduates (Mage  = 18.88 years, 60 women, 80 Whites) completed measures of social dominance orientation (SDO), testing self-efficacy, and attitudes regarding the use of cognitive ability tests in college admissions; SAT/ACT scores were collected from the registrar. Sixty-seven undergraduates (Mage  = 19.06 years, 39 women, 49 Whites) completed the same measures in Study 2, along with measures of endorsement of commonly presented arguments about test use. In Study 3, 321 American adults (Mage  = 35.58 years, 180 women, 251 Whites) completed the same measures used in Study 2; half were provided with facts about race and validity issues surrounding cognitive ability tests. Individual differences in SDO significantly predicted support for the use of cognitive ability tests in all samples, after controlling for SAT/ACT scores and test self-efficacy and also among participants who read facts about cognitive ability tests. Moreover, arguments for and against test use mediated this effect. The present study sheds new light on an old debate by demonstrating that individual differences in beliefs about hierarchy play a key role in attitudes toward cognitive ability test use.
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[
right
kwic]
[frequency of next (right) word to who]
(1)62 were (15)5 participated (29)2 Basic (43)2 read
(2)53 had (16)5 sexually (30)2 believed (44)2 require
(3)25 are (17)4 do (31)2 can (45)2 required
(4)25 have (18)4 is (32)2 commuted (46)2 scored
(5)25 underwent (19)4 responded (33)2 consumed (47)2 showed
(6)21 received (20)4 sought (34)2 deal (48)2 smoked
(7)14 presented (21)3 attended (35)2 died (49)2 struggle
(8)13 developed (22)3 has (36)2 experience (50)2 suffered
(9)11 reported (23)3 in (37)2 had, (51)2 sustained
(10)11 was (24)3 lived (38)2 live (52)2 took
(11)10 completed (25)3 may (39)2 lives (53)2 use
(12)10 experienced (26)3 met (40)2 measured (54)2 wanted
(13)8 did (27)3 work (41)2 participate
(14)5 inject (28)3 would (42)2 present

add keyword

--- WordNet output for who --- =>だれ, だれが, だれを, する(人), そしてその人は, 世界保健機構 Overview of noun who The noun who has 1 sense (no senses from tagged texts) 1. World Health Organization, WHO -- (a United Nations agency to coordinate international health activities and to help governments improve health services) --- WordNet end ---