kwic
studies
studies
right
off
ON
249
1
100
500
strict
ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -
return
kwic search for studies out of >500 occurrences
532339 occurrences (No.23 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
--- ABSTRACT ---
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[frequency of next (right) word to studies]
532339 occurrences (No.23 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
| 249) The evolutionarily conserved brain-specific suppression of Neu5Gc may indicate that its presence is toxic to this organ; however, no studies to date have directly addressed this very interesting question. |
| PMID:23471785 DOI:10.1007/128_2013_419 |
| 2015 Topics in current chemistry |
| * Why Is N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid Rare in the Vertebrate Brain? |
| - The sialic acids N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) and N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) differ by a single oxygen atom and are widely found at the terminal position of glycans on vertebrate cell surfaces. In animals capable of synthesizing Neu5Gc, most tissues and cell types express both sialic acids, in proportions that vary between species. However, it has long been noted that Neu5Gc is consistently expressed at trace to absent levels in the brains of all vertebrates studied to date. Although several reports have claimed to find low levels of Neu5Gc-containing glycans in neural tissue, no study definitively excludes the possibility of contamination with glycans from non-neural cell types. This distribution of a molecule - prominently but variably expressed in extraneural tissues but very low or absent in the brain - is, to our knowledge, unique. The evolutionarily conserved brain-specific suppression of Neu5Gc may indicate that its presence is toxic to this organ; however, no studies to date have directly addressed this very interesting question. Here we provide a historical background to this issue and discuss potential mechanisms causing the suppression of Neu5Gc expression in brain tissue, as well as mechanisms by which Neu5Gc may exert the presumed toxicity. Finally, we discuss future approaches towards understanding the mechanisms and implications of this unusual finding. |
[
right
kwic]
(1)61  have |
(14)8 with |
(27)3 demonstrate |
(40)2 including |
| (2)47 *null* | (15)7 should |
(28)3 for |
(41)2 indicated |
| (3)32 of |
(16)6 is |
(29)3 however, |
(42)2 investigating |
| (4)26 are |
(17)6 we |
(30)3 performed |
(43)2 involving |
| (5)26 on |
(18)5 suggest |
(31)3 reported |
(44)2 it |
| (6)19 in |
(19)5 the |
(32)3 since |
(45)2 or |
| (7)17 were |
(20)4 as |
(33)3 which |
(46)2 provide |
| (8)16 and |
(21)4 demonstrated |
(34)2 about |
(47)2 published |
| (9)15 to |
(22)4 evaluating |
(35)2 also |
(48)2 regarding |
| (10)10 showed |
(23)4 from |
(36)2 can |
(49)2 targeting |
| (11)8 revealed |
(24)4 indicate |
(37)2 concerning |
(50)2 tested |
| (12)8 that |
(25)4 show |
(38)2 demonstrating |
(51)2 used |
| (13)8 using |
(26)3 based |
(39)2 has |
(52)2 was |
add keyword
--- WordNet output for studies ---