ELIZA

return kwic search for significantly out of >500 occurrences
583352 occurrences (No.14 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found

307) The distribution of the adolescents in the two systems differed significantly.

--- ABSTRACT ---

PMID:23230989 DOI:10.1111/mcn.12016

2015 Maternal & child nutrition

* Nutritional assessment of pregnant adolescents: comparison of two popular classification systems.

- The objective of this study was to assess the degree of concordance between two popular classification systems [the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-2000 and the Institute of Medicine (IOM)-2009] used to categorise the nutritional status of pregnant adolescents. This cross-sectional study involved 327 pregnant adolescents (10-19 years) booking for antenatal care at a single public maternity in São Paulo, Brazil. Participants were classified into one of four categories, by both systems according to their pre-pregnancy body mass index and age. The CDC-2000 system classified significantly fewer pregnant adolescents as underweight (3.7% vs. 12.5%, P < 0.0001) and significantly more adolescents as normal-weight (86.8% vs. 75.6%, P = 0.0003) than the IOM-2009 system. The distribution of the adolescents in the two systems differed significantly. The global rate of discordance was 13.5%. The overall concordance between the two systems was marginally good (K = 0.63), being moderate for younger (<16 years) adolescents (K = 0.52). Approximately one in every seven pregnant adolescent would be classified in a non-corresponding category if the IOM-2009 classification was used instead of the CDC-2000 classification. The IOM-2009 nutritional classification, which does not take into account age and gender, tends to overestimate the proportion of underweight adolescents, especially in the younger-age group. The use of this classification system can lead to recommendations of higher gestational weight gain in a substantial proportion of pregnant adolescents, which could predispose to post-partum weight retention and future obesity.

--- ABSTRACT END ---

[
right
kwic]

[frequency of next (right) word to significantly]

(1)88 higher	(13)8 improved	(25)3 (P<0.05)	(39)2 impaired
(2)43 lower	(14)6 correlated	(27)3 affect	(40)2 increases
(3)39 increased	(15)6 elevated	(28)3 better	(41)2 induced
(4)35 reduced	(16)6 fewer	(29)3 increase	(42)2 larger
(5)32 associated	(17)6 less	(30)3 worse	(43)2 predicted
(6)17 decreased	(18)5 enhanced	(31)2 (P	(44)2 reduce
(7)13 in	(19)5 inhibited	(32)2 (p	(45)2 shorter
(8)13 more	(20)4 affected	(34)2 altered	(46)2 smaller
(9)10 greater	(21)4 attenuated	(35)2 by	(47)2 suppressed
(10)10 related	(22)4 between	(36)2 compared	(48)2 to
(11)9 null	(23)4 from	(37)2 decreased,
(12)9 different	(24)4 the	(38)2 differed

add keyword

--- WordNet output for significantly --- =>きわめて, 意味深く, 意味ありげに Overview of adv significantly The adv significantly has 3 senses (first 2 from tagged texts) 1. (6) significantly -- (in a statistically significant way; "the two groups differed significantly") 2. (3) significantly -- (in a significant manner; "our budget will be significantly affected by these new cuts") 3. importantly, significantly -- (in an important way or to an important degree; "more importantly, Weber held that the manifold meaning attached to the event by the social scientist could alter his definition of the concrete event itself") --- WordNet end ---