ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -

return kwic search for significant out of >500 occurrences
583352 occurrences (No.14 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
332) Significant between-group differences were observed for demographics, psychosocial factors, trauma and mental health symptoms.
--- ABSTRACT ---
PMID:23982989 DOI:10.1177/1359104513499355
2015 Clinical child psychology and psychiatry
* Improving antenatal risk assessment in women exposed to high risks.
- Antenatal substance use and related psychosocial risk factors are known to increase the likelihood of child protection involvement; less is known about the predictive nature of maternal reflective functioning (RF) in this population. This preliminary study assessed psychosocial and psychological risk factors for a group of substance dependent women exposed to high risks in pregnancy, and their impact on child protection involvement. Pregnant women on opiate substitution treatment (n = 11) and a comparison group (n = 15) were recruited during their third trimester to complete measures of RF (Pregnancy Interview), childhood trauma, mental health and psychosocial assessments. At postnatal follow-up, RF was reassessed (Parent Development Interview - Revised Short Version) and mother-infant dyads were videotaped to assess emotional availability (EA). Child protection services were contacted to determine if any concerns had been raised for infant safety. Significant between-group differences were observed for demographics, psychosocial factors, trauma and mental health symptoms. Unexpectedly, no significant differences were found for RF or EA between groups. Eight women in the 'exposed to high risks' group became involved with child protection services. Reflective functioning was not significantly associated with psychosocial risk factors, and therefore did not mediate the outcome of child protection involvement. Women 'exposed to high risks' were equally able to generate a model of their own and their infants' mental states and should not be seen within a deficit perspective. Further research is required to better understand the range of risk factors that predict child protection involvement in high risk groups.
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[
right
kwic]
[frequency of next (right) word to significant]
(1)67 differences (15)5 correlations (29)3 influence (44)2 dose-dependent
(2)40 increase (16)5 effects (30)3 negative (45)2 elevation
(3)36 difference (17)5 for (31)3 number (46)2 evidence
(4)28 decrease (18)5 increases (32)3 roles (47)2 factors
(5)12 reduction (19)5 risk (33)2 (P (48)2 group
(6)11 predictors (20)4 effect (35)2 alterations (49)2 inhibition
(7)10 association (21)4 in (36)2 and (50)2 interaction
(8)9 improvement (22)4 reductions (37)2 at (51)2 morbidity
(9)8 *null* (23)4 relationship (38)2 between-group (52)2 positive
(10)7 changes (24)3 (p (39)2 blood (53)2 prediction
(11)7 predictor (25)3 alteration (40)2 challenge (54)2 proportion
(12)7 role (26)3 as (41)2 contribution (55)2 source
(13)6 correlation (27)3 higher (42)2 cytotoxic (56)2 time
(14)5 associations (28)3 improvements (43)2 decreases

add keyword

--- WordNet output for significant --- =>意義深い, 重大な, 意味のある, 意味ありげな, 重要な Overview of adj significant The adj significant has 4 senses (first 4 from tagged texts) 1. (18) significant, important -- (important in effect or meaning; "a significant change in tax laws"; "a significant change in the Constitution"; "a significant contribution"; "significant details"; "statistically significant") 2. (9) significant, substantial -- (fairly large; "won by a substantial margin") 3. (3) significant -- (too closely correlated to be attributed to chance and therefore indicating a systematic relation; "the interaction effect is significant at the .01 level"; "no significant difference was found") 4. (2) meaning, pregnant, significant -- (rich in significance or implication; "a meaning look") --- WordNet end ---