ELIZA

return kwic search for significant out of >500 occurrences
583352 occurrences (No.14 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]

305) The amount of new bone regenerated was also statistically significant higher in the alloplast group (47.15% ± 8.5%) as compared to the xenograft group (22.2% ± 3.5%) (P < .05).

--- ABSTRACT ---

PMID:23772806 DOI:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00025

2015 The Journal of oral implantology

* Alveolar ridge preservation with the socket-plug technique utilizing an alloplastic putty bone substitute or a particulate xenograft: a histological pilot study.

- Following tooth extraction, ridge preservation procedures are employed to regenerate bone in the extraction socket, limit consequent ridge resorption, and provide a stable base for implant placement. The purpose of this study is to histologically evaluate and compare bone regeneration in extraction sockets grafted with either a putty alloplastic bone substitute or particulate anorganic bovine xenograft utilizing the socket-plug technique. Nineteen patients underwent 20 tooth extractions and ridge preservation following a standardized protocol. Ten sites were grafted with calcium phosphosilicate putty (CPS group) and the remaining 10 with anorganic bovine bone substitute (BO group). Patients were recalled after 4-6 months to evaluate the bone regeneration and to proceed with implant placement. A bone core was obtained during the implant procedure from each site and was used for histologic analysis. Histomorphometry revealed that residual graft values were significantly higher in the BO group (25.60% ± 5.89%) compared to the CPS group (17.40% ± 9.39%) (P < .05). The amount of new bone regenerated was also statistically significant higher in the alloplast group (47.15% ± 8.5%) as compared to the xenograft group (22.2% ± 3.5%) (P < .05). Results suggest that ridge preservation using a putty calcium phosphosilicate alloplastic bone substitute demonstrates more timely graft substitution and increased bone regeneration when compared to an anorganic bovine bone xenograft.

--- ABSTRACT END ---

[
right
kwic]

[frequency of next (right) word to significant]

(1)67 differences	(15)5 correlations	(29)3 influence	(44)2 dose-dependent
(2)40 increase	(16)5 effects	(30)3 negative	(45)2 elevation
(3)36 difference	(17)5 for	(31)3 number	(46)2 evidence
(4)28 decrease	(18)5 increases	(32)3 roles	(47)2 factors
(5)12 reduction	(19)5 risk	(33)2 (P	(48)2 group
(6)11 predictors	(20)4 effect	(35)2 alterations	(49)2 inhibition
(7)10 association	(21)4 in	(36)2 and	(50)2 interaction
(8)9 improvement	(22)4 reductions	(37)2 at	(51)2 morbidity
(9)8 null	(23)4 relationship	(38)2 between-group	(52)2 positive
(10)7 changes	(24)3 (p	(39)2 blood	(53)2 prediction
(11)7 predictor	(25)3 alteration	(40)2 challenge	(54)2 proportion
(12)7 role	(26)3 as	(41)2 contribution	(55)2 source
(13)6 correlation	(27)3 higher	(42)2 cytotoxic	(56)2 time
(14)5 associations	(28)3 improvements	(43)2 decreases

add keyword

--- WordNet output for significant --- =>意義深い, 重大な, 意味のある, 意味ありげな, 重要な Overview of adj significant The adj significant has 4 senses (first 4 from tagged texts) 1. (18) significant, important -- (important in effect or meaning; "a significant change in tax laws"; "a significant change in the Constitution"; "a significant contribution"; "significant details"; "statistically significant") 2. (9) significant, substantial -- (fairly large; "won by a substantial margin") 3. (3) significant -- (too closely correlated to be attributed to chance and therefore indicating a systematic relation; "the interaction effect is significant at the .01 level"; "no significant difference was found") 4. (2) meaning, pregnant, significant -- (rich in significance or implication; "a meaning look") --- WordNet end ---