kwic
significant
significant
right
off
ON
217
1
100
500
strict
ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -
return
kwic search for significant out of >500 occurrences
583352 occurrences (No.14 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
--- ABSTRACT ---
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[frequency of next (right) word to significant]
583352 occurrences (No.14 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
| 217) In all 3 ethnic groups, the AUCs in men were greater for BMI than for the other measures, whereas in women, the AUCs were greater for combined models than for BMI alone, but the differences were small and not clinically significant. |
| PMID:22500038 DOI:10.1177/1010539512440819 |
| 2015 Asia-Pacific journal of public health |
| * Various adiposity measures show similar positive associations with type 2 diabetes in Caucasians, native Hawaiians, and Japanese Americans: the multiethnic cohort. |
| - The authors evaluated the association of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and hip circumference (HC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) with diabetes in Caucasians, Native Hawaiians, and Japanese Americans aged 45 to 75 years in the Multiethnic Cohort. Diabetes cases were obtained from self-reports and by linkages with health insurance plans. The authors estimated adjusted prevalence odds ratios (PORs) and compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). All measures were positively associated with diabetes prevalence; the PORs were 1.25 to 1.64 in men and 1.52 to 1.83 in women. In all 3 ethnic groups, the AUCs in men were greater for BMI than for the other measures, whereas in women, the AUCs were greater for combined models than for BMI alone, but the differences were small and not clinically significant. It does not appear that one anthropometric measure best reflects diabetes prevalence or performs better in one ethnic group than in another. |
[
right
kwic]
(1)67  differences |
(15)5 correlations |
(29)3 influence |
(44)2 dose-dependent |
| (2)40 increase |
(16)5 effects |
(30)3 negative |
(45)2 elevation |
| (3)36 difference |
(17)5 for |
(31)3 number |
(46)2 evidence |
| (4)28 decrease |
(18)5 increases |
(32)3 roles |
(47)2 factors |
| (5)12 reduction |
(19)5 risk |
(33)2 (P |
(48)2 group |
| (6)11 predictors |
(20)4 effect |
(35)2 alterations |
(49)2 inhibition |
| (7)10 association |
(21)4 in |
(36)2 and |
(50)2 interaction |
| (8)9 improvement |
(22)4 reductions |
(37)2 at |
(51)2 morbidity |
| (9)8 *null* | (23)4 relationship |
(38)2 between-group |
(52)2 positive |
| (10)7 changes |
(24)3 (p |
(39)2 blood |
(53)2 prediction |
| (11)7 predictor |
(25)3 alteration |
(40)2 challenge |
(54)2 proportion |
| (12)7 role |
(26)3 as |
(41)2 contribution |
(55)2 source |
| (13)6 correlation |
(27)3 higher |
(42)2 cytotoxic |
(56)2 time |
| (14)5 associations |
(28)3 improvements |
(43)2 decreases |
add keyword
--- WordNet output for significant ---