ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -

return kwic search for significant out of >500 occurrences
583352 occurrences (No.14 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
191) Application of the PML method in our example data set shows that race and EGFR-FISH are independently significant predictors of EGFR mutation.
--- ABSTRACT ---
PMID:22246415 DOI:10.1177/0962280211434179
2015 Statistical methods in medical research
* Simpson's paradox - aggregating and partitioning populations in health disparities of lung cancer patients.
- It is well known that non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous group of diseases. Previous studies have demonstrated genetic variation among different ethnic groups in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in NSCLC. Research by our group and others has recently shown a lower frequency of EGFR mutations in African Americans with NSCLC, as compared to their White counterparts. In this study, we use our original study data of EGFR pathway genetics in African American NSCLC as an example to illustrate that univariate analyses based on aggregation versus partition of data leads to contradictory results, in order to emphasize the importance of controlling statistical confounding. We further investigate analytic approaches in logistic regression for data with separation, as is the case in our example data set, and apply appropriate methods to identify predictors of EGFR mutation. Our simulation shows that with separated or nearly separated data, penalized maximum likelihood (PML) produces estimates with smallest bias and approximately maintains the nominal value with statistical power equal to or better than that from maximum likelihood and exact conditional likelihood methods. Application of the PML method in our example data set shows that race and EGFR-FISH are independently significant predictors of EGFR mutation.
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[
right
kwic]
[frequency of next (right) word to significant]
(1)67 differences (15)5 correlations (29)3 influence (44)2 dose-dependent
(2)40 increase (16)5 effects (30)3 negative (45)2 elevation
(3)36 difference (17)5 for (31)3 number (46)2 evidence
(4)28 decrease (18)5 increases (32)3 roles (47)2 factors
(5)12 reduction (19)5 risk (33)2 (P (48)2 group
(6)11 predictors (20)4 effect (35)2 alterations (49)2 inhibition
(7)10 association (21)4 in (36)2 and (50)2 interaction
(8)9 improvement (22)4 reductions (37)2 at (51)2 morbidity
(9)8 *null* (23)4 relationship (38)2 between-group (52)2 positive
(10)7 changes (24)3 (p (39)2 blood (53)2 prediction
(11)7 predictor (25)3 alteration (40)2 challenge (54)2 proportion
(12)7 role (26)3 as (41)2 contribution (55)2 source
(13)6 correlation (27)3 higher (42)2 cytotoxic (56)2 time
(14)5 associations (28)3 improvements (43)2 decreases

add keyword

--- WordNet output for significant --- =>意義深い, 重大な, 意味のある, 意味ありげな, 重要な Overview of adj significant The adj significant has 4 senses (first 4 from tagged texts) 1. (18) significant, important -- (important in effect or meaning; "a significant change in tax laws"; "a significant change in the Constitution"; "a significant contribution"; "significant details"; "statistically significant") 2. (9) significant, substantial -- (fairly large; "won by a substantial margin") 3. (3) significant -- (too closely correlated to be attributed to chance and therefore indicating a systematic relation; "the interaction effect is significant at the .01 level"; "no significant difference was found") 4. (2) meaning, pregnant, significant -- (rich in significance or implication; "a meaning look") --- WordNet end ---