394) No significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed in the globule size of formulations made by each method, but the value of poly-dispersibility index between the two methods was found to be extremely significant (p < 0.001). |
PMID:24329559 DOI:10.3109/10717544.2013.866992 |
2015 Drug delivery |
* Formulation of nanoemulsion: a comparison between phase inversion composition method and high-pressure homogenization method. |
- There is lot of confusion in the literatures regarding the method of production of nanoemulsion. According to some authors, only the methods using high energy like high-pressure microfluidizer or high-frequency ultra-sonic devices can produce actual nanoemulsions. In contrast to this concept, one research group reported for the first time the preparation of nanoemulsion by a low-energy method. Later on many authors reported about the low-energy emulsification method. The purpose of this work is to formulate, evaluate and compare nanoemulsions prepared using high-energy as well as low-energy method. Nanoemulsions formulated were based on the phase inversion composition technique (low energy method) and were selected from the ternary phase diagram based on the criterion of their being a minimum concentration of S(mix) used in the formulation. For high-pressure homogenization method (high energy method) Design-Expert software was used, and the desirability function was probed to acquire an optimized formulation. No significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed in the globule size of formulations made by each method, but the value of poly-dispersibility index between the two methods was found to be extremely significant (p < 0.001). A very significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed in the drug release from formulations made by each method. More than 60% of the drug was released from all the formulations in the initial 2 h of the dissolution study. |
(1)81 *null* | (12)7 with | (23)2 allowed | (34)2 may |
(2)59 for | (13)6 using | (24)2 among | (35)2 on |
(3)39 of | (14)5 has | (25)2 but | (36)2 provided |
(4)39 to | (15)5 used | (26)2 by | (37)2 should |
(5)37 was | (16)4 showed | (27)2 choice | (38)2 study |
(6)26 is | (17)4 which | (28)2 combined | (39)2 the |
(7)24 and | (18)3 are | (29)2 could | (40)2 uses |
(8)15 in | (19)3 as | (30)2 from | (41)2 we |
(9)9 that | (20)3 significantly | (31)2 helped | |
(10)8 can | (21)2 a | (32)2 involves | |
(11)7 based | (22)2 against | (33)2 known |
add keyword