kwic
important
important
right
off
ON
340
1
100
500
strict
ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -
return
kwic search for important out of >500 occurrences
448856 occurrences (No.37 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
--- ABSTRACT ---
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[frequency of next (right) word to important]
448856 occurrences (No.37 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
| 340) The aim of this article is to draw attention to an under-recognised but ethically important phenomenon involving the deception of children in research. |
| PMID:24307618 DOI:10.1136/medethics-2013-101618 |
| 2015 Journal of medical ethics |
| * Deception of children in research. |
| - The aim of this article is to draw attention to an under-recognised but ethically important phenomenon involving the deception of children in research. The type of deception we are referring to is not planned deception that is part of the research design. Instead it is deception that occurs in individual cases where parents ask researchers not to reveal something about the research to their child. Our focus is children who do not have ultimate decisional authority--children around the ages of 7-14 years old who may have the cognitive capacity to understand but not to consent for themselves; children whose agreement is required but not sufficient to authorise research. We provide three illustrative scenarios for analysis. Then, we identify circumstances in which non-disclosure might be justified and set out reasons why providing information to non-competent children is ethically required. On this basis, we argue that non-planned deception requested by parents is very unlikely to be ethically acceptable. Finally, we recommend that guidelines should (a) require researchers to consider what to do if parents do not want to disclose information to a child and (b) clarify that the most ethical response is to simply not include that child in the research. |
[
right
kwic]
(1)65  role |
(16)4 data |
(31)2 alternative |
(46)2 indicator |
| (2)37 for |
(17)4 differences |
(32)2 aspect |
(47)2 mechanism |
| (3)34 to |
(18)3 approach |
(33)2 baseline |
(48)2 model |
| (4)28 in |
(19)3 causes |
(34)2 because |
(49)2 molecular |
| (5)15 implications |
(20)3 clinical |
(35)2 bivalve, |
(50)2 not |
| (6)11 factor |
(21)3 findings |
(36)2 complication |
(51)2 pathogen |
| (7)9 *null* | (22)3 genes |
(37)2 components |
(52)2 phenomenon |
| (8)9 and |
(23)3 health |
(38)2 consequences |
(53)2 physiological |
| (9)8 determinants |
(24)3 human |
(39)2 contributor |
(54)2 protective |
| (10)8 roles |
(25)3 insights |
(40)2 coping |
(55)2 route |
| (11)7 factors |
(26)3 policy |
(41)2 determinant |
(56)2 standard |
| (12)6 cause |
(27)3 predictors |
(42)2 economic |
(57)2 step |
| (13)5 component |
(28)3 public |
(43)2 element |
(58)2 strategic |
| (14)5 risk |
(29)3 when |
(44)2 fish |
(59)2 subset |
| (15)4 as |
(30)2 DNA |
(45)2 function |
(60)2 target |
add keyword
--- WordNet output for important ---