kwic
data
data
right
off
ON
84
1
100
500
strict
ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -
return
kwic search for data out of >500 occurrences
617251 occurrences (No.12 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
--- ABSTRACT ---
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[frequency of next (right) word to data]
617251 occurrences (No.12 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
| 84) Data were collected from a convenience sample of 104 (26.3%) males and 292 (73.7%) females with a median age 53 years. |
| PMID:23420057 DOI:10.1177/1010539513475652 |
| 2015 Asia-Pacific journal of public health |
| * Determinants of self-management among diabetic patients: a path analysis. |
| - Diabetes self-management (DSM) is a complex behavior and various factors influence it. Despite continual recommendations to DSM, implementation of this behavior still remains a major health problem for diabetic patients. Identifying effective factors in DSM is useful to promote health in diabetic patients. The purpose of this study was to test the effects of individual and environmental factors on DSM. Path analysis was used to examine both one-way direct and indirect effects of 7 constructs and 3 demographic factors on DSM in this population (N = 396). Data were collected from a convenience sample of 104 (26.3%) males and 292 (73.7%) females with a median age 53 years. The final model provided a good fit to the data explaining 25% of the variance in DSM. Illness perception and provider-patient communication were the most effective factors in DSM. Knowledge and self-efficacy affected DSM indirectly via illness perception. The results of this study showed that effective DSM interventions should be designed to change illness perception and patient-provider communication, especially in patients with low duration of diabetes and low level of education. |
[
right
kwic]
(1)70  from |
(14)7 revealed |
(27)3 analyses |
(40)2 at |
| (2)55 were |
(15)7 support |
(28)3 can |
(41)2 by |
| (3)32 *null* | (16)7 was |
(29)3 concerning |
(42)2 clearly |
| (4)26 on |
(17)6 analysis |
(30)3 in |
(43)2 clustering |
| (5)19 and |
(18)6 obtained |
(31)3 indicated |
(44)2 have |
| (6)18 for |
(19)5 collection |
(32)3 may |
(45)2 here |
| (7)17 suggest |
(20)5 sets |
(33)3 the |
(46)2 highlight |
| (8)13 are |
(21)5 showed |
(34)3 which |
(47)2 mining |
| (9)11 set |
(22)5 we |
(35)3 with |
(48)2 show |
| (10)11 to |
(23)4 demonstrate |
(36)3 would |
(49)2 shows |
| (11)9 of |
(24)4 is |
(37)2 about |
|
| (12)7 collected |
(25)4 provide |
(38)2 also |
|
| (13)7 indicate |
(26)4 regarding |
(39)2 as |
add keyword
--- WordNet output for data ---