ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -

return kwic search for clinical out of >500 occurrences
554339 occurrences (No.20 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
378) The reviewers were unaware of the patients' identity and all aspects of clinical care.
--- ABSTRACT ---
PMID:23993039 DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2013.06.004
2015 The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons
* Interobserver and intraobserver reliability assessment of calcaneal fracture classification systems.
- The aim of the present study was to assess the reliability of commonly used intra-articular calcaneal fracture classification systems and to compare them with the newer AO Integral Classification of Injuries (ICI) system. Forty computed tomography and radiographic images of 40 intra-articular calcaneal fractures were reviewed independently by 3 reviewers on 2 separate occasions and classified according to the Essex-Lopresti, Atkins, Zwipp and Tscherne, Sanders, and AO-ICI classification systems. The reviewers were unaware of the patients' identity and all aspects of clinical care. The data were analyzed using kappa (κ) statistics to assess the intra- and interobserver reliability. The κ values were calculated for Essex-Lopresti (κ = 0.85 intraobserver, κ = 0.78 interobserver), Atkins (κ = 0.42 intraobserver, κ = 0.73 interobserver), Zwipp and Tscherne (κ = 0.40 intraobserver, κ = 0.47 interobserver), Sanders (κ = 0.31 intraobserver, κ = 0.35 interobserver), and AO-ICI (κ = 0.41 intraobserver, κ = 0.33 interobserver). The AO-ICI classification system had levels of reproducibility similar to that of the Sanders classification, currently the most widely used system. The Essex-Lopresti classification demonstrated improved reliability compared with that reported in previous studies. This can be attributed to using sagittal computed tomography images, in addition to the originally described plain radiographs, for assessment. This improvement is relevant because of its accepted prognostic predictability.
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[
right
kwic]
[frequency of next (right) word to clinical]
(1)36 and (17)5 application (33)3 attachment (49)2 grading
(2)26 practice (18)5 data (34)3 course, (50)2 interventions
(3)22 trials (19)5 efficacy (35)3 examination, (51)2 literature
(4)19 trial (20)5 features (36)3 experience (52)2 measures
(5)14 research (21)5 outcome (37)3 information (53)2 nurse
(6)14 studies (22)5 picture (38)3 manifestations (54)2 observations
(7)10 use (23)5 relevance (39)3 significance (55)2 point
(8)8 parameters (24)5 symptoms (40)3 variables (56)2 practice,
(9)8 settings (25)5 translation (41)2 benefits (57)2 presentation,
(10)8 signs (26)5 trials, (42)2 cases (58)2 process
(11)8 study (27)5 utility (43)2 conditions (59)2 results
(12)7 examination (28)4 characteristics (44)2 context (60)2 sample,
(13)7 implications (29)4 evaluation (45)2 decision-making (61)2 situation
(14)7 presentation (30)4 management (46)2 decisions (62)2 situations,
(15)6 applications (31)4 outcomes (47)2 diagnosis (63)2 success
(16)6 course (32)4 signs, (48)2 findings (64)2 tooth

add keyword

--- WordNet output for clinical --- =>客観的な態度の, 臨床の, 臨床治療の, 臨床, 分析的な, 冷静な, 客観的な, 病院に関するものだ, 病院関係の Overview of adj clinical The adj clinical has 2 senses (first 2 from tagged texts) 1. (14) clinical -- (relating to a clinic or conducted in or as if in a clinic and depending on direct observation of patients; "clinical observation"; "clinical case study") 2. (1) clinical -- (scientifically detached; unemotional; "he spoke in the clipped clinical monotones typical of police testimony") --- WordNet end ---