471) The duration of QTc interval was compared among the four groups. |
472) ining debris in the groove was scored and compared among the groups using non-parame |
473) The new substitutes have been compared and characterized for matrix comp |
474) calcaneofibular ligament (CaFL) were then compared and the three-dimensional ankle j |
475) on Index (GDI) to detect gait changes was compared in a child with cerebral palsy wh |
476) at the time of delivery were assessed and compared in women with moderate and severe |
477) within the Veterans Health Administration compared patients served by three intensiv |
478) We compared patients with lesions to the pPAR |
479) , the adsorption of As(III) and As(V) was compared using a number of non-allophanic |
480) mability/rigidity of the three groups was compared using the two methods. |
481) The data were statistically compared (α = 5%). |
482) For other outcome variables, we compared 42 coeliac patients with MI and 2 |
483) ere used in this meta-analysis; 2 studies compared GEM treatment with best supportiv |
484) When pain scores were compared, TMD resulted in statistically si |
485) A range of indicators were compared across 3 time periods (30-36 mont |
486) For the evaluation study we compared an intervention group of 141 chil |
487) kin hydration) between the two groups was compared directly and gave a significant m |
488) and stimulant medication use (56 %) were compared during a baseline with eyes close |
489) This study compared fatalism of Chinese and Korean im |
490) ent time intervals (T1-T0 and T2-T1) were compared for both groups and a statistical |
491) surface treatment to dental porcelain and compared it to oven glaze (auto-glaze) by |
492) Here, recombinant (r)HuCRT and rTcCRT are compared on their abilities to affect fibr |
493) We compared people at different levels of sci |
494) This study compared provider attitudes and practices |
495) We compared qualitative data collected during |
496) lciparum population of Kong Mong Tha, and compared results with those previously obt |
497) This study compared risks of secondhand smoke exposur |
498) They compared smokers who sought assistance in |
499) tracer injections in each area/field, and compared them with those of area 8/FEF. |
500) Groups were compared through histological assessment, |
|