269) Significant increases in occurrence of oli |
270) Significant increases were also evident in |
271) Analysis of gene expression revealed significant increases in COL1A2 and SOX9. |
272) In males, CRS induced significant increases in both ulcer number |
273) Latent growth curve models showed significant increases in pain, physical li |
274) ing high-level ventilatory support, is at significant risk during transport to radio |
275) ate model confirmed only nulliparity as a significant risk factor (P = 0.029), altho |
276) chronic liver disease and cirrhosis were significant risk factors associated with d |
277) and neglectful childhood experiences are significant risk factors for severe affect |
278) High-grade tumours have significant risk of LR regardless of HTFM |
279) photodynamic therapy (aPDT) plus SRP has significant effect compared with SRP alone |
280) Ageing is predicted to have a more significant effect on strain deep in the n |
281) and type of post (p < 0.001) had a significant effect on the bond strength, w |
282) L) and time interval had no statistically significant effect on the implant's temper |
283) se in proliferative function was the most significant in T-cells stimulated with CD3 |
284) these differences were not statistically significant in both type of bone used (P & |
285) r lifestyle factors, these ORs were still significant in normal-weight men but not i |
286) Finally, the SWCNTs did not evoke significant in vivo micronuclei frequencie |
287) Significant reductions were found for the |
288) s in the 2 age groups at follow-up showed significant reductions from the baseline, |
289) There were significant reductions in neck and upper a |
290) 8-day and one-gen exposure, statistically significant reductions were observed in th |
291) There was no statistically significant relationship between EBF and g |
292) However, there is no significant relationship between economic |
293) There was a low but significant relationship between time spen |
294) toms and clinical tooth conditions showed significant relationship. |
295) Results obtained show a significant (p < 0.001-0.05) change in |
296) ere different from controls statistically significant (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, |
297) Further, a significant (p < 0.01) increase in ROS |
298) Significant alteration in hematological pa |
299) However, significant alteration in cell-mediated im |
300) No statistically significant alteration was found for saliv |
301) e coronary lesion became haemodynamically significant as a combination of the hypope |
|