210) The analyses were based on response of 480 men aged 15 to 54 years, l |
211) l methods were carried out to analyse the response of DBP gels in vivo. |
212) However, the response of HUVECs to P. |
213) The growth response of Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestr |
214) nd control volume (CV)] for modelling the response of a short cylindrical pipe repre |
215) -chemical properties and the in vivo host response of a surface sandblasted with par |
216) iological studies have shown the enhanced response of anterior cingulate cortex (ACC |
217) e shape and damage on the depth-dependent response of bone to nanoindentation using |
218) y describes the anisotropic biomechanical response of cancellous bone through stress |
219) uantify the heterogeneity in the antibody response of cattle primo-vaccinated agains |
220) bean unsaponifiables (ASU) on the healing response of cutaneous wound defect in rats |
221) This review summarizes the biological response of dentin-pulp complexes to a var |
222) In this study, we examined the clinical response of diabetic patients with critica |
223) The response of hippocampal synapses to affere |
224) r results show that ER stress is an early response of major types of breast cancer c |
225) g (DW-MRI) in the assessment of treatment response of primary or secondary liver mal |
226) The response of prodigiosin was determined usi |
227) ic model significantly contributed to the response of prodigiosin. |
228) estigate whether the rapid stress-induced response of the glutamatergic synapse was |
229) the phantom hand leads to a change in the response of the primary somatosensory cort |
230) e factors (HIFs) play crucial role in the response of tumor cells to this distinct m |
231) Cx43 may influence the response of tumor cells to treatments by f |
232) sicians, 408 were included in the sample (response rate 57 %); overall, 89.5 % had b |
233) Study population consisted of 133 nurses (response rate 89.3%). |
234) ght patients completed the questionnaire (response rate 92%); 95% of these were pati |
235) ong 594 nurses in two teaching hospitals (response rate 99.5%). |
236) Response rate was 24.9% (N = 278). |
237) Response rate was 90.7% (5446), out of whi |
238) The overall response rate (ORR) to the MOMP protocol w |
239) The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly high |
240) The response rate for handgrip strength was 94 |
241) m control of micrometastatic disease, the response rate is suboptimal, prompting the |
242) of 3113 students from 52 schools, with a response rate of 100% at the school level, |
|