1) Applying adjusted cutoffs (lower than recommended based on receiver o |
2) were composed of particles with diameter lower than 355 μm. |
3) ver, TBZ and ABZ showed a lethal activity lower than 50%. |
4) Although the specificity was lower than ISG by 3% for ICBD and 2% for r |
5) CTASI ASPECTS was lower than NCCT ASPECTS in each time categ |
6) Verbal IQ (86.59) was found to be lower than Performance IQ (92.64). |
7) blings of children with CHD or cancer was lower than QoL in the CF or type 1 diabete |
8) lence in these refugee populations may be lower than US populations. |
9) was higher than Tehran and Tuyserkan, but lower than Zahedan. |
10) f helmet use among students (3%) was much lower than adults (66%). |
11) rt perceived their children's HrQoL to be lower than children themselves. |
12) kal population in Serbia is significantly lower than expected from earlier studies, |
13) Mean frequency ratings were consistently lower than importance ratings, suggesting |
14) w in the Nicotine group was significantly lower than in the Control group, it was si |
15) Although generics are priced roughly 30% lower than originators on average, the var |
16) e present investigation are substantially lower than previous research has indicated |
17) The suicide number in 2010 was lower than that in 2009 for men, while tha |
18) tive stress in pancreatic cancer cells is lower than that in normal duct cells, and |
19) e in the allergic group was significantly lower than that observed in the non-allerg |
20) n HT-29 cancer cells and is significantly lower than that of 5-FU and 5-FU loaded PL |
21) oocytes recovered in PI was significantly lower than that of MII oocytes (P = 0.031) |
22) ously increased, and it was significantly lower than that of air abrasion group. |
23) ound in this study are comparatively much lower than that reported for the USA, base |
24) gingivalis LPS was markedly lower than that to E. |
25) A nanosuspensions group was significantly lower than the Injection® group. |
26) The LVEF of patients with a low PFR was lower than the LVEF of patients with norma |
27) median sEPCR values in the HSP group were lower than the control group (79 vs. |
28) -arms of PT, ST and BF were significantly lower than the corresponding 2D values (p |
29) measured at least one standard deviation lower than the mean VRT™, 0% reoffended. |
30) me of patients with PUs was significantly lower than the non PUs group (94 versus 41 |
31) (225-250 mOsm/kg H2O), which is slightly lower than the normal range of osmolality |
32) n(2+) values that were nearly three-folds lower than the peak values generated by th |
33) peed compared with subjects whose BDI was lower than their actual age. |
|