1) Compared to the EOT group, the LOT group d |
2) Compared to the age-matched rats exposed t |
3) Compared to the matched controls, women wi |
4) Compared to the nonnutritional cellulose t |
5) lower and mean C 24h was 5.4-fold higher compared to the 300-mg IRT. |
6) apoptotic death (TUNEL-positive cells) as compared to the 4NQO group. |
7) formability was lower in SS and SC groups compared to the AA group and SS and SC pat |
8) 7 cells and human hepatoma HepG2 cells as compared to the AE solution, while they sh |
9) ample contains twice the amount of silver compared to the AgY2 sample. |
10) ations were endorsed in the SP only group compared to the AvPD only group. |
11) tive to the low and moderate risk groups, compared to the BGPS data. |
12) higher in the BO group (25.60% ± 5.89%) compared to the CPS group (17.40% ± 9.39% |
13) owed faster recovery in the PGf/Col group compared to the Col group up to 7 weeks. |
14) gnificantly reduced in the Nicotine group compared to the Control group. |
15) and more favorable gingival wound healing compared to the ElS, suggesting that the E |
16) tissue revealed much less thermal damage, compared to the ElS. |
17) retreatment group was significantly lower compared to the FRC Postec posts control g |
18) xpression difference in the induced cells compared to the MSCs. |
19) greater resistance to cyclic fatigue when compared to the NiTi rotary PathFiles. |
20) eutic aPTT was 2 hours shorter in the PDI compared to the PA group, 8 ± 4 hours ver |
21) accelerated wound recovery remarkably as compared to the PHBV control. |
22) ethod will be described and explored, and compared to the Receive Operator Character |
23) id, they showed less interest towards pet compared to the TD children. |
24) accepting attitudes in the Netherlands as compared to the United States. |
25) area (p < 0.05) at all time points compared to the baseline measurements. |
26) ortionate growth of the costal cartilages compared to the bony thoracic skeleton, pu |
27) Our results show that, compared to the cohorts reared at 20 °C |
28) ynthesized complexes are more stable when compared to the complex obtained by mixing |
29) ntal impairment on the inoculated side as compared to the contralateral side (P < |
30) dren smiled more often with the robot, as compared to the control condition, but the |
31) t group was higher (1.55 ± 0.33 mm) compared to the control group (1.06 ± |
32) pressure ulcers in the intervention group compared to the control group (5 versus 20 |
33) The NLR was higher within the VPC group compared to the control group (P < .001 |
|